Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 14:14

Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Commanders CB Lattimore feeling 'way better' - ESPN
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Fixing the Phoenix Suns: Retooling the roster in 6 steps - Bright Side Of The Sun
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
6 recalls you can’t miss this week - NJ.com
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Dolphins place Terron Armstead on reserve-retired list - NBC Sports
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What is the most interesting question you can ask to get to know someone?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.